Peter Lairo wrote:
> I think it is
> being *deliberately* ignored because the Linux users in charge of the
> bug don't understand why it is important to windows users. :(
Could you explain why it is?
I see it this way: The PW protection is of course worthless. Anybody
really wanting to access your profile data can still do so. And the
others don't care about your profile anyway, so PW protection doesn't
change anything.
And I don't see why this is windows specific... Windows can also be
configured to require a password to logon.
--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin
