Peter Lairo wrote: > dman84 wrote: > >> its not high on anyones priority list.. its futured too, unless >> someone has time to work on it besides the assigned bug owner.. > > > I thought there was a patch ready and waiting for this. I think it is > being *deliberately* ignored because the Linux users in charge of the > bug don't understand why it is important to windows users. :( >
Wow, I never thought of this. If you *don't* want a bug fixed, just take ownership of it, profess a patch is near, and then just let it die on the vine. Brilliant!! -- sid
