PeEmm typed: > Red wrote: > >> We all know Bundy is a troll. However I am disappointed at the >> behavior of Jay Garcia and the fact that Kyle Bundy has made some >> points about Jay Garcia not knowing what he was talking about and >> giving out bad answers. However, Bundy doesn't need to gloat about it. >> The two of them need to take this private and settle it. >> >> I personally am sick and tired of both of them. They need to take >> break and get their thoughts in check. >> > > About this I only have one objection. Please, don't call Kyle a troll. > By doing this you'll risk to drain the concept of all its usefulness. > Kyle is the most energetic and one of the most interesting critics of > the Mozilla project. Sometimes (most often?) he is in the wrong, but he > always replies, and he really keeps this news group going!
I try to make issues on purpose. Yea, I could file bug reports (up to what 130,000 (most of them dups or fixed) or post problems/complaints here. Like the latest Mozilla .9.8 nighties have improved again after two weeks of full retreat. Today, I am playing with it on 98 instead of XP. (minus the Java, I just don't like 1.3.1). Tonight I'll probably run a some to load sites through the ringer on Mozilla, to see how it compares. > > A troll doesn't act this way. A troll is a kind of freak, posting a > false statement, then sitting in front of the monitor, eagerly watching > the incoming replies and the thread growing bigger. This is what gives > him satisfaction. He never intended to contribute to a discussion in the > first place. There was an excellent example of a troll posting a few > days ago on the subject "New Virus set to hit for Netscape 6.21 and > Mozilla builds on Wednesday". A troll posting shall never be replied to, > since this is what keeps the troll going. > But you know something, when Moz has good builds, I also am quick to admit them. The latest few nightlies, much better after it seemed to be 2 weeks of retreat. It will be interesting to see how Moz acts under 98, I will do a memory leak test also. Bundy style.. Hopefully when Moz gets to 1.0 and it is stable, Netscape will use that build and call it 7.0 (not 6.5 for reasons I have already explained, Netscape needs to totally get away from calling it 6.x) and not bloat it down (which they are getting better at) and make sure the add-ons are always up to date (Real Player etc.) AOL/Netscape have proven they can beat MS in some areas (AIM vs Micros**t's Messenger). I really, really hope AOL puts full support in making this a competitive product. I seen a few crumbles that they actually might, but until the big boys start reporting it, I don't buy into it. :) -- Kyle
