Jay Garcia wrote: > On 03/12/2002 11:04 AM, DeMoN LaG wrote: >> Stuart Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 12 Mar 2002: >> >>> What bothers me is that a person with an @netscape.com email >>> address is saying "should this turn out to be true". If an >>> @netscape person who *works* on gecko hasn't had it confirmed to >>> him, it seems somewhat unlikely that anything is set in stone yet. >>> >> >> Anything this huge (that can completely swing who has dominance in the >> web browser category) would be kept under wraps. I doubt if anyone >> with an @netscape.com email address would be told this info, and if >> they were, they would be made to sign a few hundred pages of NDA >> > > I understand from a client that ZDNET has now picked up on the story but > I don't have the time to hunt down the URL ... >
http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104-857681.html Source is Reuters > Later ... > > -- Software is like sex, it's better when it's free - Linus Torvalds Anti-spam e-mail address, change _AT_, sorry for the inconvenience
