Christian Biesinger typed: > Bundy wrote: > [Mozilla vs Netscape 6.x] > >> 1) It is more problem free... kind of... To get Java and plug-ins to >> work takes a little bit of effort. (moving files, and a few .js file >> tweaks) > > > I never needed to change a .js file to install Java, I only had to copy > (Windows) or symlink (linux) 1 file. > > > >
1 file under windows? Name it. Netscape 6.2.1 requires zero file transfers to get Java working. You've got to know exactly what files in what directory and transfer to them to the current directory under Mozilla. We won't discuss the other plug-ins. To Mozilla's defense, it's not meant to be an easy to use end user product. -- Kyle
