Bamm Gabriana wrote: >>>We won't discuss the other plug-ins. To Mozilla's defense, it's not >>>meant to be an easy to use end user product. >> >>Are you saying it's Mozilla's fault if the plugin's installation program >>doesn't install correctly in Mozilla? >> >>Note that Mozilla _is_ meant to be an easy to use product. > > > I thought Mozilla's main purpose is to provide code that commercial > distributors like Netscape can use? Binaries are distributed for testing > purposes only. I believe this means it is not intended as an end product > in itself.
Yes, but if it's not an easy to use product, no commercial distributor would bother.
