Martin Fritsche wrote:
> Pascal Chevrel wrote:
>
>> Many mozilla users use it, if people use it, it is by definition useful.
>
>
> I prefer Xchat. Chatzilla is too slow.
>
>> I guess that it is pure provocation from your part, Opera mail client
>> totally lacks of ergonomy and features. You can't even create
>> sub-folders or create HTML messages.
>
>
> If an mail client cannot create HMTL messages it is a feature. A HTML
> message is *never* usefull.
>
Depends on your background, I s'pose. HTML messages have their problems
(largely due to how e-mail clients mark 'em up, from what I can see),
and may not have any added utility over and above a plain-text message,
but, damn!, they're generally more readable. Unless, of course, you
like reading messages that wrap every 40 characters or so. . . .
One of the things I /do/ look for in an e-mail client is the ability to
have full justification, tho' that may just be my print background.
When e-mail clients support, say,   in place of a tab (and IE,
say, decides to render it properly), I'll actually be happy.
Just personal preference, I guess. Again, it's that damned print
background coming out. And at least in Moz I can turn off JavaScript in
e-mails, &c (an Outlook-using friend's major complaint with HTML mail).
Brian
--
Signs are taken for wonders. 'We would see a sign!'
The word within a word, unable to speak a word,
Swaddled in darkness. In the juvescence of the year
Came Christ the tiger
-- T. S. Eliot, 'Gerontion'
