Jason Fleshman wrote: > Ah. Took a look at the source of the page; he has it in an onClick. > When the link that does the install showed up as already visited and > with the page's URL as its destination, I thought he might have just > linked the page back to itself. Maybe he should use a JavaScript URL > instead to avoid confusing dumba**es like me :)
Most certanly not. The current way, people who have disabled JavaScript will still be able to use the link. If he made the link point to "javascript:(something)", they wouldn't. /Jonas
