Jonas J�rgensen wrote: > Jason Fleshman wrote: > >> Ah. Took a look at the source of the page; he has it in an onClick. >> When the link that does the install showed up as already visited and >> with the page's URL as its destination, I thought he might have just >> linked the page back to itself. Maybe he should use a JavaScript URL >> instead to avoid confusing dumba**es like me :) > > > Most certanly not. The current way, people who have disabled JavaScript > will still be able to use the link. If he made the link point to > "javascript:(something)", they wouldn't. > > /Jonas >
I can't get it to work at all either way with javascript disabled. So it really doesn't matter, but since you asked, it's back to its original form except now it links to itself so people who like to look at the status bar can see it does something. grayrest
