[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Erik van der Poel) wrote:
>Hi Simon,
>
>Here are a few more pieces of info that we would like to have:
>
>1. download size of Mozilla with and without bidi code
For Win32 builds, total size of bin directory and subdirectories:
without Bidi: 31773859 bytes; with Bidi 32293027 bytes.
The Bidi build is ~500K larger, an increase of less than 2%.
The same builds zipped up:
without Bidi: 15391832 bytes; with Bidi: 15595613 bytes -- 199K
increase.
>2. run-time memory consumption with and without bidi code, on non-bidi
>documents
>3. performance on non-bidi documents, with and without bidi code
I tried to check this out, but I get more variation between different
attempts to load a given document with the same build than I do
between different builds. Maybe you can recommend some tools that will
give me this info?
>Also, it would be really helpful to the reviewers if there was a design
>overview, as Steve already mentioned.
See elsewhere in this thread.
Simon
