Simon Montagu wrote:
>
> The messages I read on the porkjockeys newsgroup confirm the
> impression I was getting from my own tests: footprint is very variable
> from one test to another. I would need to run lots of tests to get a
> statistically significant sample, but my impression so far is that the
> increase in footprint usage when loading a non-bidi document with a
> bidi build is not larger than the variations between one load and
> another with the same build.
There were some postings in the porkjockeys newsgroup that showed graphs
comparing various memory allocators, with memory on the Y axis and the
number of successive URLs loaded on the X axis. I don't know how these
graphs were generated, but perhaps they are somewhat automated. If so,
it would be great if you could run the same automated tests on a bidi
build (with non-bidi documents).
Also, there were some postings about document load times for a set of
URLs, with graphs.
I believe that [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] were involved
with those postings, and that they may be able to give you some info
about automated tests.
Thanks,
Erik
