Simon Montagu wrote:
>
> I didn't find any other static tables, but the one above was included
> unnecessarily in a lot of different places
OK.
> All files not in the above list are now exactly the same size in Bidi
> and non-Bidi builds.
That's exactly what I wanted to hear!
Now, another important number would be the run-time memory use. I would
expect the run-time footprint to increase somewhat when a bidi document
is encountered and processed, but I would hope that it doesn't increase
much when a non-bidi document is processed.
Have you taken a look at the mozilla.porkjockeys newsgroup? There have
been a lot of messages recently about memory use. It would be a good
idea to use some of those methods for your measurements. Or perhaps you
have some other ideas, such as using some Windows tools, or whatever.
The speed of a non-bidi document is also important to measure.
Thanks,
Erik
