"Adam Sj�gren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2001 22:56:19 +0200, Roland M�sl wrote:
>
> > I have per page about 20 <DIV with top left width height
>
> > px are 2 byte more times 20 DIV time 4 times used.
>
> > I will not waste 160 byte bandwith per page, only because some
> > people can not think on a usefull default.
>
> > 160 bytes per page are at 200.000 page views per month 32 MB wasted
> > bandwith
>
> If you changed "left" to "l", "right" to "r", "width" to "w" and
> "height" to "h", you would be saving 20*16 bytes per page!
>
> If you're worried about such small potatoes, why not configure your
> webserver to gzip the pages for browsers that support that (many
> (most?) do)?
>
> Saving bandwidth is definately not a valid argument for breaking the
> standards.
You brought me on a great idea to increase download speed!
<div id=desc style="position:absolute;left:8;top:410;width:600;height:1;">
<script
language=JavaScript>m("desc",0,400,0,110,160,150,340,30,200,130,0,30,600,1)
</script>
Is my current code for every DIV Block.
About 20 of them used for a page.
I could reduce to
<div id=desc>
<script
language=JavaScript>m("desc",0,400,0,110,160,150,340,30,200,130,0,30,600,1)
</script>
Only disadvantage:
All who switched off Javascript or have an
V4 browser would see no layout any more.
So I will do this maybe at christmas when Netscape 4
is down to 2% and not worth to waste for the
few users to lazy to upgrade about 1 Kb bandwith
per page any more.
--
Roland M�sl
http://pege.org Clear targets for a confused civilization
http://BeingFound.com Web Design starts at the search engine
