Can anyone tell me whether it's intentional to render a full line height when an image on that line is smaller than the line height ?
That wasn't very well explained - here's what I mean: <table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tr><td height="1"><img src="spacer.gif" height="1" width="1"/></td></tr></table> The table cell will be a full line high. Leave out the img and the table renders just one pixel high. Spaces between/amongst tags seem irrelevent. Another example: ... </table> <img src="spacer.gif" height="1" width="1"/> <table> ... There's a full line between them. IE seems to get it right (or maybe wrong! but quite different, and more to expectations). (All this on Moz9.4/Win2k) Now before anyone starts banging on about the inadequacies of anyone who positions elements user spacer gifs, these are just examples to illustrate the point. Anyway, is anyone else finding this frustrating? Thanks to anyone who replies, Alistair
