"Michael Gratton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Matt Seitz wrote: > > > > The bug was marked "Fixed" and "Verified" by the QA contact. > > > > Eh? Ah, that wasn't what you said. [shrug]
Sorry, you are right. I should have said "I am surprised the developer would consider this "fixed" and that QA would consider this "verified." > If it is just poor design causing the visual problems, then I still > agree with them. If it is simply a poorly designed frame, then I would understand closing the bug (although I'd prefer assigning it to Evangelism). My concern was that I saw no indication in the Bugzilla comments that this was an issue of poor page design. The comments simply said there was a user workaround: manually slide the frame around. As I said in my Bugzilla comments, I think this workaround should lower the priority of the problem, but should not be considered a final fix.
