Roland M�sl wrote:
> "Adam Sj�gren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>>I'm was merely asking you why you keep posing similar questions again
>>and again, when you know what the answer is.
> Simple to mess up Your tiny little clean world
Oh, right. After all, Germany isn't _that_ large, so yes, you might call
it a "tiny little world". But "clean"? How so?
> and confront You with the reality of
> demands for a good browser.
Demands for a good browser are to stop the crap with adding proprietary
extensions and instead start with the future - which is XHTML 1.1, XML,
CSS 3, MathML, SVG, DOM (2? not positive) and so on.
> MSIE is good, because there was the challenge
> to beat Netscape.
MSIE is a good browser, yes. Mozilla is also a good browser. Personally,
I find Mozilla better, and more importantly, I see a lot more future in
it than in MSIE as it currently is.
> When their is absolut nothing beside MSIE,
> MSIE developers will become more and more lazy.
That's right, but it will never happen.
> So it's important to do something for Mozilla.
> So I invest some time in my "Hello, wake up"
> posts.
Hmm... "Hello, wake up" rhymes with "Hello, I suck!" - just coincidence?
--
Regards,
S�ren Kuklau ('Chucker')
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
