In article <3e133183$0$7368$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fabrice BONNY wrote: > michael lefevre wrote: > >> because nobody thinks it's important enough - there are many more >> important CSS problems to fix. if someone offers to do the work, it will >> get done. > > First of all, thanks. > Is there a place (or someone) to ask for that ?
the way to ask would be to file a bug - as you have seen, that has already been done. but just because people are asking, doesn't mean that anyone will do it. mozilla.org project doesn't have people that work on implementing stuff in the code - the coding is done by people that volunteer to do it (including a lot that Netscape/AOL staff do), but they will only implement what they want to implement. if you can find someone else that wants to code it, that would be great... otherwise it'll sit there until somebody volunteers... >> no other browser supports it, and text-shadow will probably be dropped >> from the first revision of CSS 2 (CSS 2.1) > > It's logical. If no browser support it, nobody use it and it will be > removed. >:-) indeed. > But what must I think about http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-text/#text-shadows ? >:-| I imagine that will probably stay there. There are reasons for removing it from CSS2(.1), but there's no reason to remove it from the future CSS3 standard. However, if you wait for CSS3 to be finalised, and the features to be implemented by browsers just to be compliant with CSS3, that will take a while. Mozilla and Opera are leading the way, and they are not even completely covering CSS2 yet... -- michael
