--- Ben Bucksch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rodrigo Salda�a Z�rate wrote:
>
> > would the contributing authors have
> > to conform to the fact that their code has to
> be
> > re-dual-licensed in order to make it back
> into
> > the 'official' tree?
I can't even remember what was that about :P
> > even worse, if A was working in a Mozilla
> derived
> > work under GPL and inserted his/her/it's (for
> the
> > FSF [NOT necessarily the FSF though]) own
code in such numbers
>
> Then he can either choose to
> - offer the modifications to Mozilla under the
> MPL/GPL dual license and
> give it back to the official tree, making it
> availbale for nearly everybody
> - restrict the modifications to the GPL and
> maintain them by himself
> (which is a considerable work)
an evil organization could profit from that ...
> The problem you express is exactly the reason
> why some (cls, IIRC)
> object to the MPL/GPL *dual license*.
(cls, IIRC) - please explain? I think I heard
IIRC somewhere, but what does cls mean?
btw, I agree with Gervase Markam the forker
wouldn't be very popular but you never know ...
:)
=====
Sometimes, WE won�t let THEM climb the TREE, WE�re afraid THEY might see the FOREST
By deleting your unwanted E-Mail you waste one keystroke, yet
by throwing away paper mail you waste our planet! SAVE THE
TREES and support internet E-Mail instead of paper mail!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] =^.^= members.xoom.com/MoonDreams
May the �tar Light of the �ailor �couts surround you and protect you
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/
