> header so that now new_foo.c is GPL, he then > reintroduces new_foo.c as foo.c and procedes to > do the same with the other 34 modules (which > contain real code), What do you mean by "reintroduces"? ImBad couldn't check this code into mozilla.org because a) he doesn't have checkin rights and b) it's not dual-licensed. > month, IOweYou launches MyProgram for free, which > is an exact copy of Simon's company Program, Where did IOweYou get the source for the proprietary bits of Program, if any? (If there are no proprietary bits, MyBusiness is not selling much.) Gerv
- Re: 'Dual-license enabling, choice and enforcement' Salda�a
- Re: 'Dual-license enabling, choice and enforcement' Ben Bucksch
- Re: 'Dual-license enabling, choice and enforcement' Gervase Markham
- Re: 'Dual-license enabling, choice and enforcement' Salda�a
- Re: 'Dual-license enabling, choice and enforcement' Salda�a
- Re: 'Dual-license enabling, choice and enforcement' Gervase Markham
- Re: 'Dual-license enabling, choice and enforcement' Daniel Veditz
- Re: 'Dual-license enabling, choice and enforcemen... Simon P. Lucy
- Re: 'Dual-license enabling, choice and enforcement' Simon P. Lucy
- Re: 'Dual-license enabling, choice and enforcement' Daniel Veditz
- Re: 'Dual-license enabling, choice and enforcemen... Simon P. Lucy
