Norris Boyd wrote:
> I'm no lawyer
Me neither. (This sucks.)
> but my reading of the license matches your 1 & 3. I don't
> believe you have to acknowledge use of Rhino, but it certainly doesn't hurt. In
> the splash screen for your own product (or similar startup text) you might say
> something like "Uses Mozilla Rhino from mozilla.org. See
> http://www.mozilla.org/rhino."
You have to tell users where to find the source code for Rhino. It is OK
to point to a concrete, stable mozilla.org resource (e.g. CVS tag), if
you don't alter the source.
> Michael Meadows wrote:
>
> > I'm developing a commercial product which I would like to use Rhino
> > unaltered and unamended as a flexible scripting language to control aspects
> > of this product. I've ploughed through the NPL license agreement and quite
> > frankly can't understand much of it at all.
> >
> > At the moment I'm making the following assumptions:
> > 1. I can distrubute js.jar freely with this product.
> > 2. I must legally acknowledge the use of Rhino.
> > 3. I don't need to make the product open source providing I don't alter
> > Rhino in any way.
