Re: LDAP C SDK 5.0 & MPL/GPL

[Daniel Veditz]

Michael Hein wrote:
> 
> Bjorn Reese wrote:
> 
> > Instead we opted for a MPL/BSD
> > dual-license. This weakens the copyleft of the project, which is the
> > the opposite effect of what the FSF wants to achieve -- and the irony
> > of it all is, that GPL was the direct cause of this shift.
> 
> Do you mind posting the dual MPL/BSD you used .... the more I learn
> about GPL this seems quite attractive

Didn't you start the thread asking about converting the NPL'd LDAK code?
Netscape and mozilla.org specifically rejected the BSD when creating the MPL
(we were strongly inclined to go with an existing license at the start) and
Netscape may still be unwilling to release its code under those terms.

-Dan Veditz