Re: LDAP C SDK 5.0 & MPL/GPL

[Ben Bucksch]

Bjorn Reese wrote:

> The FSF is more concerned about the whole than the individual parts. In
> mathematical terms, the FSF wants the union of GPL and another license to
> be strictly equal to GPL. The problem the FSF has with MPL, is that there
> are additional restrictions on the whole.

mozilla.org is no different here, with s/GPL/MPL (modulo NPL), not? It 
wants the whole mozilla.org code to be available under the MPL terms. 
Less so for purity, but more for practical terms. And I agree - having x 
licenses is not practical and could turn potential users/contributors away.