Simon P. Lucy wrote: >On 22/09/2001 at 14:14 Simon P. Lucy wrote: > >>I'm going to try this one more time. A long while ago I suggested a >>mechanism that would allow the multiple licencing of source files whilst >>ensuring the avoidance of doubt in any particular use. >> >And a deafening silence is the result, not even a 'its rubbish go away'. It speaks >volumes I think. > I think that only refering to a license (not adding any more blurb; e.g. "This file can be used under the MPL.") makes sense. I see no reasons to add all that stuff at the top of each file. But I am not a laywer...
I see no reason for your compile-time flag, though, as it won't change anything in the resulting binary.
