> And a deafening silence is the result, not even a 'its rubbish go away'.


I don't believe it's necessary, because I (and, as I understand it, the 
other staff, and anyone else who has ever implemented a dual licensing 
scheme) do not agree with your interpretation of how dual licensing works.

In addition, it has (in my view) a large number of practical problems, 
but I'm not going to detail them here because I don't have time to argue 
about them :-)

Gerv


Reply via email to