Ian Hickson wrote: >Why do we care about LGPL projects and not, say, projects using the >original BSD license, ... > [...]
>They come from the "GPL-Incompatible, Free Software Licenses" section of >the FSF license list: > http://www.fsf.org/licenses/license-list.html#GPLIncompatibleLicenses > 'Incompatible with GPL' does not at all mean 'incompatible with MPL'. >It's only in a single source file that the problem occurs. > Doesn't the problem occur, if I mix an (all-)MPL file with an (all-)LGPL? Does that count as linking/library in any case? >I am confused as to what problem you have with the LGPL that you don't >have with the other licenses. > That's probably because *I* am confused about what the LGPL allows and what not. I should just shut up and call it a day.
