On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Ben Bucksch wrote:
>
> Ian Hickson wrote:
>
>> Is there a need (real or perceived) for Mozilla code to be
>> distributable as an LGPL library?
>>
> Yes, for the same reason as to use it under GPL terms: In order to use
> it in LGPL projects.
Why do we care about LGPL projects and not, say, projects using the
original BSD license, the Apache license, the Zope license, the IBM public
license, the Qt public license, the Sun Industry Standards Source License,
etc, etc, etc?
For that matter, why do we want to promote _any_ non-strong-copyleft
projects, other than Mozilla itself?
--
Ian Hickson )\ _. - ._.) fL
/. `- ' ( `--'
`- , ) - > ) \
irc.mozilla.org:Hixie _________________________ (.' \) (.' -' __________
