> I am not sure about the licensing, so here are my questions:
Your questions would be best answered by reading the license :-) It's available at http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/ . We're happy to give you advice on what we (and most other people) think it means if you like. > 1. Under what conditions can we distribute the SpiderMonkey > library together with our commercial application. This is exactly what the license document sets out, and it's the best source. > 2. Do we have to publish our new application under e.g. MPL or > GPL license in case we use the SpiderMonkey? No. Section 3.7 (and others.) > 3. Can we sell the software (in case we use the SpiderMonkey > library) without any restriction related to MPL/NPL/GPL? > We want to charge our customers for the whole application. Yes. > 4. Do we have to enclose also the source code of the SpiderMonkey > to our application? Not necessarily. See section 3.6. > 5. Do we have to mention somewhere we use the SpiderMonkey library? > Where? Is a splash screen enough? Yes, you probably do. Section 3.3. Gerv
