> Aiui, the NPL is not a free license. It doesn't conform to the free software or open source definitions, no.
> Aiui, some files in the "Mozilla codebase" are NPL > only. These files are not dual or triple licensed. > > Note here that I am talking about the best possible > view of the situation: if the tip file currently in > CVS is NPL only, I still would not count that as NPL > only if Netscape have already given permission for > that file to be dual/triple licensed so that it is > already really free. Netscape have given permission for all NPL files which are part of Mozilla to be triply licensed. The rest is a matter of implementation :-) So, if someone wants particular files relicensed for their purposes, we could go in and do it by hand. But, meantime, we are waiting for the MPL relicensing to be completed before we whack the tree some more. Gerv
