> > files in that case) doesn't allow to be mixed > > with the MPL, and we have MPL-only files in > > the tree. > > OK. Hmm. So SeaMonkey is free, but incompatible > (in terms of mixing source) with some other free > software. Is that correct?
The point of the relicensing is to make it compatible; because this is not yet complete, then the answer is that it depends what source you want to mix. Licensing issues are complicated, and there are no simple answers (yet). People should ask in here on a case-by-case basis. Gerv
