>From my reading and the advise of council, MPL allows covered code to mix with non-covered code for a larger work without requiring that non-covered code be converted to MPL. GPL converts all code of a larger work to GPL. Whether this is a pro or con depends on who you are. That is the most significant difference I am aware of.
Christopher Bibbs > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 3:00 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: What is the difference, or pros/cons between GPL and > Mozilla licenses ? > > > Hello, > > Is one more rigid than the other ? Does anyone know what the > pros/cons are, or is there a webpage that explains this - I could not > find on the web. The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it. _______________________________________________ mozilla-license mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-license
