Bibbs, Christopher wrote:

From my reading and the advise of council, MPL allows covered code to mix
with non-covered code for a larger work without requiring that non-covered
code be converted to MPL.

To be more specific: the "copyleft" on the MPL is per-file, so if you change an MPLed file, you have to ship the source of the changes, whereas the copyleft on the GPL is per linked application - which is much broader.


Gerv

_______________________________________________
mozilla-license mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-license

Reply via email to