As a result, those people who feel a strong copyleft is critical prefer the GPL. Those people who want to retain more choice about what happens to combinations of code often prefer the MPL. The MPL was written to require people to keep MPL code open source, and also to allow combinations with closed source code.
There are other differences, but that is usually the one people think about first. There is some additional information at http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/FAQ.html. It's from the original launch of the Mozilla project, but much of the info is still valid, even though the MPL is now managed by the Mozilla Foundation rather than Netscape.
Mitchell
Jack wrote:
Hello,
Is one more rigid than the other ? Does anyone know what the pros/cons are, or is there a webpage that explains this - I could not find on the web.
Thanks!
Jack _______________________________________________ mozilla-license mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-license
_______________________________________________ mozilla-license mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-license
