> Note that depending on license requirements, such a combination is not > always possible. The answer to your problem may end up being "just don't > use that code, then."
Most, if not all, the contributed original code has been previously licensed under the GPL and per the GPL, redistributed under the GPL.
Then why do you want to use the MPL at all?
> You can make your _changes_ available under the dual-license, but not > the original code. Making this fact clear would be very complicated, and > a recipe for confusion.
The way I was going to approach this was to license the modified script under a dual MPL/GPL with the appropriate boilerplate.
You can't do that - because it's applying a new license to code you have not written.
Gerv _______________________________________________ mozilla-license mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-license
