Scott Putterman wrote:
> FYI, there's talk of changing the target to be a 300MHz machine
> instead of a 133. I think we might change the memory to 128MB as well.
Duh, no, please don't. Needing 128 MB of RAM just for OS plus browser is
not reasonable. And I am usually pretty ignorant in these questions
("buy new RAM, it's cheap!").
We should *lower* the memory-requirements. Memory is a major crititque,
e.g. c't (German computer magazine) routinely bashes Netscape 6 (in
part) for that reason.
Memory being extremely cheap at the moment is not too much of an
argument, because it will probably go up considerably again. (See
history of mem prices and some rumors about mergers.)
--
This message is protected by ROT0 encryption and the DMCA.
Reading is disallowed and will be prosecuted.
