Since it was only FMI, this is perhaps nothign to discuss.. But, I would
of course disagree with that... why should a stronger Mac be required
than a ditto Intel machine?
Leif
Scott Putterman wrote:
> FYI, there's talk of changing the target to be a 300MHz machine instead
> of a 133. I think we might change the memory to 128MB as well.
> leif wrote:
>
>> Be careful. Irony is difficult to understand ;-)
>>
>> I had a look at the Mac page and I was deligted to see that my own
>> machine is stronger than the test machine mentioned there. Which I
>> found promising.Or at least it made me hopeful.
>>
>> Leif
>>
>> Scott Putterman wrote:
>>
>>> thanks for the feedback. it's helpful.
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>> Eugene Savitsky wrote:
>>
>>
>> ....>>
>>
>>>> Mda... Not very impressive... :(
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
