In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, G F
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "J.B. Moreno" wrote:
> >
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > Chuck Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Bull.
> >
> > The FROM of the message in question will have the email address,
> > including it in the Message-ID itself simply aids in finding followups
-snip-
> > From: JD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Message-ID: <tih.12345678$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-snip-
> There is no particular reason that either the from line or the message
> ID reveal any information about the author of a message.
Uhm, that's exactly my point -- the idea that the email address in the
>From in a post shouldn't be used in the message-id of that post because
of "privacy" concerns is quite simply bullshit; it has no basis in
reality.
Now, if someone were to suggest that a particular address ought to be
used regardless of which identity is being used to make the post, then
/that/ would be a privacy concern. But no one is advocating that.
--
J.B. Moreno
