"J.B. Moreno" wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, G F
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > "J.B. Moreno" wrote:
> > >
> > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > > Chuck Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Bull.
> > >
> > > The FROM of the message in question will have the email address,
> > > including it in the Message-ID itself simply aids in finding followups
> -snip-
> > > From: JD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Message-ID: <tih.12345678$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> -snip-
> > There is no particular reason that either the from line or the message
> > ID reveal any information about the author of a message.
>
> Uhm, that's exactly my point -- the idea that the email address in the
> From in a post shouldn't be used in the message-id of that post because
> of "privacy" concerns is quite simply bullshit; it has no basis in
> reality.
>
> Now, if someone were to suggest that a particular address ought to be
> used regardless of which identity is being used to make the post, then
> /that/ would be a privacy concern. But no one is advocating that.
>
> --
> J.B. Moreno
Except Holger. Read his posts carefully. My simple minded header
corruption is retrograde to his desires yet what I did is not forbidden
by the RFC's in any direct way.
Chuck
--
... The times have been,
That, when the brains were out,
the man would die. ... Macbeth
Chuck Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
