I hate to add a 'me too' post, but I agree a spell checker is
essential. I was going to beging using Moz as my primary browser/mail
client, but without a spell checker, that just will not work. *sigh*,
back fo NS 4.77 :-(.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian Clark) wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> I would just like to add my two cents: I would really like to see a
> spell check included in Mozilla. There are opensource spell check
> engines out their such as ispell and aspell. Perhaps one of these
> could be adapted to work with Mozilla so we don't have to use
> *Netscape's* spell checker.
>
> Anyway, I also consider it a very basic feature, not a bell or
> whistle. It is needed.
>
> Brian!
>
>
> Duane Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > Jacek Piskozub wrote:
> > > Duane Clark wrote:
> > >> ...
> > >> Oh well, of course spell check worked fine with Mozilla 0.9.2, so it
> > >> sounds like someone at Netscape/AOL put a stop to it. Sigh...
> > >>
> > >
> > > You can use any build fronm the 0.9.2 branch (on the FTP server those
> > > are the directories ending with -0.9.2 or more recently -0.9.2ec). This
> > > branch works OK with the Netscape spellchecker. No wonder as it is the
> > > basis of the next Netscape release.
> >
> > Well, when that get there with Netscape, I might have to try it out.
> > Spellcheck really isn't an "extra whizbang feature" in a news/mail client.
> >
> > If I had some free time I might have tried to figure out what broke
> > myself (though I am not really a coding geek - I mostly work on
> > hardware). I cannot imagine in can be something major, since it worked
> > fine in 0.9.2. And the button shows up in 0.9.3; it just crashes Mozilla
> > when clicked.
> >
> > >
> > > Jacek
> > >
> > > PS. I changed the coding of this message for Duane back to ISO-8859-1 ;-)
> > >
> >
> > Thanks. That worked much better :-)
