michael wrote:
>
> DeMoN LaG wrote:
>
> > michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 31
> > Aug 2001:
> >
> >
> >>Thanks Fulvio, I figured that I was just a really bad person
> >>for wanting to control my word wrap, I just wanted
> >>confirmation that it was me and not NetZilla that was the
> >>problem.
> >>
> >>Hey everybody, maybe The DOJ should sue Mozilla or AOL or
> >>whoever the flock makes this bloated mess masquerading as a
> >>"Communicator" now, to force them to separate into a browser
> >>company, a newsreader company and an email company.
> >>
> >
> > If Mozilla came bundled with over 95% of all new computer purchased,
> > always ran in the background, and was integrated so tightly with the
> > system it couldn't be uninstalled than I would agree. otherwise, you
> > don't like it, don't use it
>
> Well, I was kinda joking there, but not really...
>
> If AONetZiLLa needs to get split up, it's not because they
> are abusing monopoly power, it's because they are abusing
> usability.
>
> this is Michael
> reporting live...
> http://dogtv.com
>
>
Nah, it has to do with money. M$ can afford billions of bucks to work on
the browser, whereas the AOL gang it can only afford millions. That
means 1000 times as many people for MS. I could be a little off in my
estimates, but I would bet they have at least 10 times as many people
working on it. When we get down to one browser, we can start looking
forward to leasing it yearly, or something like that.
Joe
