Garth Wallace wrote: > I love how, after you wrote out this whole > sarcastic message, you screwed up the posting > so there are two copies in the group. That's > pretty funny. That's because I wasn't subscribed to the "secnews.netscape.com" server, and my first post didn't show up, under my @home server, so I sent it again. Anyway, here's an example of another annoying feature I'm really glad they did away with: The ability to easily click backwards to the beginning of a thread by simply clicking on hyperlinked numbers. On my wish list, I hope they bury that about fifty layers deep in a .js file, so I can practice my programming skills if I want to use my newsreader. -- this is michael reporting live... http://dogtv.com
- Re: What They Broke in 6.1 Messenger (NEWS) DeMoN LaG
- Re: What They Broke in 6.1 Messenger (NEWS) michael
- Re: What They Broke in 6.1 Messenger (NEWS) Fulvio Perini
- Re: What They Broke in 6.1 Messenger (NEWS) michael
- Re: What They Broke in 6.1 Messenger (NEWS) Holger Metzger
- Re: What They Broke in 6.1 Messenger (NEWS) Holger Metzger
- Re: What They Broke in 6.1 Messenger (NEWS) Ric Gates
- Re: What They Broke in 6.1 Messenger (NEWS) Garth Wallace
- Re: What They Broke in 6.1 Messenger (NEWS) michael
- Re: What They Broke in 6.1 Messenger (NEWS) Ben Bucksch
- Re: What They Broke in 6.1 Messenger (NEWS) jesus X
- Re: What They Broke in 6.1 Messenger (NEWS) Holger Metzger
- Re: What They Broke in 6.1 Messenger (NEWS) Michael F Gordon
- Re: What They Broke in 6.1 Messenger (NEWS) jP
- Re: What They Broke in 6.1 Messenger (NEWS) MICHAEL
- Re: What They Broke in 6.1 Messenger (NEWS) Orrin Edenfield
- Re: What They Broke in 6.1 Messenger (NEWS) jP

