Jay Garcia wrote:

> On 10/25/2001 10:10 AM, barney wrote:
> 
>> Jay Garcia wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>On 10/24/2001 8:53 PM, barney wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Juan Tamad wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Jay Garcia wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>View Headers is now implemented in latest build today 2001102403 Win98.
>>>>>>A little minor touchup is needed but all in all looks really good.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>I don't know if it's just me but I tried build 2001102403 on Win2K and I 
>>>>>did'nt see any headers at all, not a single one. Maybe someone forgot to 
>>>>>refresh the display or something. I promptly switched back to a previous 
>>>>>build. By the way I think something else is broken in 2001102403 in 
>>>>>particular with respect to word wrapping when composing mail. It doesn't 
>>>>>wrap at all.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>I tried build 2001102403 on win98se for about 10 minutes.  The Reply
>>>>button in news was totally disabled!  After checking out the
>>>>n.p.m.builds group I decided to wait for the next build to see if it's
>>>>improved.  If not, I'll start filing bugs.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>There are two builds today, try the latest. Headers work for the most
>>>part, a few bugs still there but it works. The reply button works as well.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> 
>> Yes, I know there were two builds for 10/24.  Unfortunately, the 2nd
>> talkback build (.zip) that was in the /latest-trunk/ directory was the
>> 102403 build, presumably the same as the first, even though it had a
>> timestamp of 16:05.  This happens with talkback zips sometimes, don't
>> know why, but something goes wrong with the "packaging".  I'm
>> downloading 10/25 now.  We'll see what we get.  It could still be 102403. :)
>> 
>> 
> 
> Instead of /latest-trunk/ try latest/nightly
> 
> 
> 

I think it's actually nightly/latest. ;)  I never touch that one any
more.  I got burned a couple times when /latest/ had something other
than trunk builds in it.  latest-trunk is safer, build bugginess aside.
:)  Speaking of which, this time I had the 10/25 build running for just
*5 minutes* before I backed down to 10/23.  It's going downhill, me
thinks. :)  At least all the bugs I saw in those few moments have
already been reported.

We'll try again tomorrow, or maybe I'll just stick with 10/23 for a few
days.  Ain't this fun? :-)


Reply via email to