On 10/25/2001 2:26 PM, barney wrote: > Jay Garcia wrote: > > >>On 10/25/2001 10:10 AM, barney wrote: >> >> >>>Jay Garcia wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>On 10/24/2001 8:53 PM, barney wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Juan Tamad wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Jay Garcia wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>View Headers is now implemented in latest build today 2001102403 Win98. >>>>>>>A little minor touchup is needed but all in all looks really good. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>I don't know if it's just me but I tried build 2001102403 on Win2K and I >>>>>>did'nt see any headers at all, not a single one. Maybe someone forgot to >>>>>>refresh the display or something. I promptly switched back to a previous >>>>>>build. By the way I think something else is broken in 2001102403 in >>>>>>particular with respect to word wrapping when composing mail. It doesn't >>>>>>wrap at all. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>I tried build 2001102403 on win98se for about 10 minutes. The Reply >>>>>button in news was totally disabled! After checking out the >>>>>n.p.m.builds group I decided to wait for the next build to see if it's >>>>>improved. If not, I'll start filing bugs. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>There are two builds today, try the latest. Headers work for the most >>>>part, a few bugs still there but it works. The reply button works as well. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>Yes, I know there were two builds for 10/24. Unfortunately, the 2nd >>>talkback build (.zip) that was in the /latest-trunk/ directory was the >>>102403 build, presumably the same as the first, even though it had a >>>timestamp of 16:05. This happens with talkback zips sometimes, don't >>>know why, but something goes wrong with the "packaging". I'm >>>downloading 10/25 now. We'll see what we get. It could still be 102403. :) >>> >>> >>> >>Instead of /latest-trunk/ try latest/nightly >> >> >> >> > > I think it's actually nightly/latest. ;) I never touch that one any > more. I got burned a couple times when /latest/ had something other > than trunk builds in it. latest-trunk is safer, build bugginess aside. > :) Speaking of which, this time I had the 10/25 build running for just > *5 minutes* before I backed down to 10/23. It's going downhill, me > thinks. :) At least all the bugs I saw in those few moments have > already been reported. > > We'll try again tomorrow, or maybe I'll just stick with 10/23 for a few > days. Ain't this fun? :-) > >
I install every 'latest', sometimes as much as 3 times in one day. Living on the edge is fun. -- Jay Garcia - Netscape Champion Novell MCNE-5/CNI-Networking Technologies-OSI UFAQ - http://www.UFAQ.org
