Steve Carroll wrote: > It's NOT the fact that Mozilla doesn't have a built-in spell checker > that annoys me (check and you'll see that I'm using 6.2), it's the > rude, sarcastic and outright inflammatory remarks that Mozilla > representative make about the issue that gets my dander up. > > I realize it's a question that gets answered LOTS, and i can see why > your sick of answering it.
Let's do an experiment. Go, subscribe to this mailing list and promise us to answer all posts of those many users, incl. those spell-checker questions, incl. those who insist on in. One year and thousands of posts later, we talk again. Deal? IMO, the FAQ is hard, but within the bounds of fairness (and funny, at least for us insiders). At least, it is very clear. > But -- instead of biting people's heads off and posting insulting > pages to the Mozilla web site, why not just explain in the release notes IIRC, there *is* a note in the release notes about the spell-checker. > each of your end distributors wanted to include their own spell > checker and therefore the base Mozilla suit does not have one by design. That's not true. Everybody, incl. Netscape, and even more so Beonex, would appreciate an open-source spell-checker.
