On 11/12/2001 7:57 PM, Gervase Markham wrote:
>> Your missing the point, jesus. It's NOT the fact that Mozilla doesn't >> have a built-in spell checker that annoys me (check and you'll see >> that I'm using 6.2), it's the rude, sarcastic and outright >> inflammatory remarks that Mozilla representative make about the issue >> that gets my dander up. > > > > I am not making the remarks in my capacity as a Mozilla representative. > The disclaimer at the bottom of the FAQ makes that clear. You are not the first, or only Mozilla person to make such remarks. I wasn't speaking necessarily about you alone. As for the disclaimer on the bottom of "your" web site, it actually confuses the issue. It's on a web site with mozilla.org in it primary address, what are suspose to think? How are we to know when y'all are speaking officially or unofficially? > >> I realize it's a question that gets answered LOTS, and i can see why >> your sick of answering it. But -- instead of biting people's heads >> off and posting insulting pages to the Mozilla web site, > > > > Correction - the page is on a personal website of mine. How is one to know that? The url contains mozilla.org in its base. > >> why not just explain in the release notes, or on mozilla.org/index.html, > > > > Why don't we list _all_ the features we don't have in the release notes? > :-) > > Gerv >
