On 11/12/2001 7:53 PM, Gervase Markham wrote: >>> Perhaps part of the problem is that people are firing of emails >>> without enough thought and care. I don't need a spell-checker because >>> I read everything I send through again to catch typos and mistakes. >> >> >> "Firing of emails"???? LOL > > > A spell-checker would not have caught that, now, would it? "of" is a > perfectly valid english word. > > And what makes you think I didn't do that on purpose? > > Gerv > I didn't say spell checker WOULD have caught that. I only said it made me laugh. See, I do have a sense of humor ;-)
- Re: Spell-checker FAQ Steve Carroll
- Re: Spell-checker FAQ Jay Garcia
- Re: Spell-checker FAQ Jay Garcia
- Re: Spell-checker FAQ Steve Carroll
- Re: Spell-checker FAQ Jay Garcia
- Re: Spell-checker FAQ Ben Bucksch
- Re: Spell-checker FAQ Gervase Markham
- Re: Spell-checker FAQ Gervase Markham
- Re: Spell-checker FAQ Steve Carroll
- Re: Spell-checker FAQ Gervase Markham
- Re: Spell-checker FAQ Steve Carroll
- Re: Spell-checker FAQ Steve Carroll
- Re: Spell-checker FAQ Ben Bucksch
- Re: Spell-checker FAQ Pascal Chevrel
- Re: Spell-checker FAQ Ben Bucksch
- Re: Spell-checker FAQ Gervase Markham
- Re: Spell-checker FAQ Garth Wallace
- Re: Spell-checker FAQ Gervase Markham
- Re: Spell-checker FAQ Steve Carroll
- Re: Spell-checker FAQ Ben Bucksch
- Re: Spell-checker FAQ Steve Carroll
