Jennifer Glick wrote:

> In response to the original posting,  Mail Security Spec 
> <news://news.mozilla.org/3BE067D8.E521F3E9%40netscape.com>, some 
> alternative ideas are posted here:
> http://www.mozilla.org/mailnews/specs/security/Options.html

Overall these seem much better. I prefer option 1 over the others, as I 
see no particular reason that the security options shouldn't be in the 
*Options* menu with the other per message options (in fact, consistency 
would suggest that's where it should be). The status bar stuff is much 
better.

What happened to the idea of showing whether certs were available for 
each of the addressees? (i.e. how is the sender supposed to track down 
which of the adressees is causing the problem when the "encrypt if 
possible" option is used and a cert is missing? Perhaps just changing 
the existing address card icon to display a superimposed lock if a cert 
is available for that person (as opposed to having a new column of icons 
down the right hand side of the addresses)?

As for the issue of discoverability -- I'm of the opinion that 
encryption and signing should be turned on by default to encourage 
widespread usage, and that mozilla should be able to automatically 
generate a certificate if the user doesn't already have one.

Cheers,
        Len.


Reply via email to