I believe Travis is correct in that InoculateIT Personal Edition (IPE) 
decieded to delete the inbox file.  I use IPE, but I have toned down the 
settings as far as what it is allowed to delete.

Under 'Options -> Program -> Cleaning Options' I have set the 'Action on 
Uncleanable' to 'Rename' thus not allowing IPE to delete any files.

If you look at the help files included with the program, it states, 
"Delete: Delete causes IPE to delete irrevocably any file that it finds 
has been infected with a virus.  The file is first overwritten with 'D's 
and then set to zero length, so no recovery of the deleted files is 
possible."  Ouch :\

Also, under the "Advanced Cleaning" button there are addional options 
that you may want to evaluate.

Regards,
   JM



Travis Crump wrote:
> I hope you also filed a bug with the InnoculateIT people since this 
> definitely seems like the fault of the Antivirus software.  Antivirus 
> programs like Norton protect e-mail by downloading the email through an 
> antiviral proxy so that it is scanned before it is passed to the e-mail 
> program.  Since InnoculateIT actively blocks Mozilla from portions of 
> their website, I doubt they do this, but instead they just scan all 
> files being writen to the hard disk.  The problem with this approach is 
> that by the time the virus attachment is being written to the harddrive, 
> it is already part of the file Inbox like all other e-mail messages(this 
> is the standard of storing e-mail).  Then InnoculateIT goes, "file Inbox 
> has the BadTrans virus, lets delete the whole file so the user isn't 
> infected, oops there goes all your e-mail".  I am sure you have already 
> tried this, but if not, check InnoculateIT's list of quarintine files 
> for the lost Inboxes..
> 
> Michael Collette wrote:
> 
>> There's already a bug out on this, but I thought I'd also make mention 
>> of this in the newsgroup as I believe this to be critical.
>>
>> http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116443
>>
>> I recently moved a friend of mine on over to Mozilla Mail and off of 
>> Netscape 4.7x.  Things went pretty smoothly with the transition all in 
>> all. The usual hiccups of things being in different places and all 
>> that to get through.  Some moaning about lack of a spell check, but 
>> that was the worst of it.
>>
>> Then a few days ago the BadTrans virus ended up in his mail.  After 
>> many months of badgering him about not clicking on attachments I'm 
>> quite certain he didn't.  The anti-virus software running 
>> (InnoculateIT) saw the nasty coming in and warned him about it.  
>> Certainly not the first virus he's had coming at him. Somewhere in 
>> this, his entire inbox was wiped clean, along with one other folder, 
>> seemingly at random.  He's got a lot of folders.
>>
>> After about a day of sending out E-Mails to people to please resend 
>> anything recent he was back up and running again.  Things were going 
>> pretty good for a few days.  Then the other day he was just switching 
>> between one of his archived folders and the inbox.  Poof, all gone!  
>> No more inbox, and one other folder wiped clean.  This time no trace 
>> of the data, and not even so much as a dialog box.  Didn't even get a 
>> feedback trace as there was no crash to instigate one.
>>
>> I wanted to get this up on the newsgroup here as this is about a real 
>> world a situation as I can think of.  This user is not a power user by 
>> any means, but he does get quite a lot of E-Mail going in and out.  
>> He's lost some critical E-mail that he hadn't even had a chance to 
>> read yet, much less backup.  I've got egg all over my face for even 
>> suggesting that he try Mozilla as a mail client.
>>
>> Spent the better part of the other day going over both Pegasus and 
>> Eurdora as an alternative for this user.  Finally managed to convert 
>> everything on over to Eudora for him.  I'm using KMail under FreeBSD, 
>> so not so much a concern for myself.  Some learning pains here and 
>> there, but otherwise things are once again going well for this user.  
>> Eudora's addressing is kind of hokey compared to Moz, but otherwise 
>> excels in most other areas of importance in dealing with E-Mail.  Data 
>> integrity being the most notable.
>>
>> I fully realize this is going to be taken by some on this group as a 
>> flame or just a troll.  Perhaps it is, but it's also an honest story 
>> of my efforts in advocating Mozilla as a mail client.  I know full 
>> well that most folks haven't had this kind of data loss with Mozilla, 
>> and I really don't know why this one user had the experience he did.  
>> I do know that this user isn't going to be trying Mozilla for E-Mail 
>> anytime soon, and this one time advocate is feeling really gun shy 
>> about doing so in the future.
>>
>> Later on,
>>
> 


Reply via email to