Graphity wrote:
> What I don't understand is why Mozilla makes ** to bold. In chats and > forums _ _ is to be takes as bold, I think. ** are common for, let's say > actions like *shiver* or *g*. I'd prefer seein' it in italic... > But that's just what I think, I guess it has already been discussed what > should be done with wich "tags" and I looking forward to read them when > I get flamed about this mail :-) There are various markup rules depending on where you play ... we now see why html had to be a standard and what would have happened had it not been. In "structured text" ala wiki/zope et al ... they also use * for italic and ** for bold with _ as underline and even tags for bullets and <dt>. However none of these are standards and thus some annoying three-different-ways-of-doing-it will happen I guess. J
