Ben Bucksch wrote: > MichaelP wrote: > >> Ben Bucksch wrote: >> >>> You haven't been infected, have you? If you care about attachments, >>> you surely won't confirm the save. >> >> >> That's right - I have not been infected. But at the moment I opened >> the message I felt helpless only being dependent on the capabilities >> of may AV software. > > > You were /not/ "only being dependent on the capabilities of [your] AV > software". Without AV software, you would just have to have clicked cancel.
It seems, You are right. But it was very surprising for me. Now, I know better. Thanks. > > That being said, I agree that it is a very bad situation. We shouldn't > show that dialog at all. It's Gecko stuff, though, so *I* can't fix it. > >> If the attachment is plain HTML, You are right. But what happens, if >> not (like BadTrans &Co)? > > > The same that happens when the bad HTML is in the body of the mail. > Indeed > Mozilla Mailnews is an HTML-capable mailer (after all, Netscape > *invented* HTML-mail, IIRC, and still pushes it). If you don't like that > fact (I'd agree with you), bug 30888 is one of the options for you. > This option would be very fine. Lets hope, this will be available soon. The Mozilla-Team does really great work :-) So, thank You very much Michael
