R.Danner III wrote: > Odd thing: First time I ran across this convention, it wasn't in > reference to HTML _at all_. Instead
Yes, quite possible that this convention *existed* even before HTML.
R.Danner III wrote: > Odd thing: First time I ran across this convention, it wasn't in > reference to HTML _at all_. Instead
Yes, quite possible that this convention *existed* even before HTML.